Objective

Our objective was to assess the U.S. Postal Service’s employee background screening process in the San Francisco, Bay-Valley, and Sierra Coastal districts to determine whether they ensured individuals selected for employment were suitable to maintain the safety and security of the mail and uphold public trust in the Postal Service.

We selected the San Francisco, Bay-Valley, and Sierra Coastal districts because they had the highest turnover rates for employees of the eight districts in the Pacific Area.

The Postal Service’s background screening process involves four key groups: the Human Resources Shared Services Center (HRSSC), a Postal Service contractor, district Human Resources (HR) officials, and the Postal Inspection Service. Both career and non-career employees are subject to the same background screening process.

At a high level, the hiring process includes pre-screening, where information is gathered to gauge the candidate’s suitability. Then there is an interview process, where an initial hiring decision is made. With a favorable initial decision, the applicant undergoes a more in-depth background screening to validate that information provided is accurate. Upon receipt of those results, management either upholds or rescinds the hiring decision.

In fiscal years (FY) 2016 and 2017, these districts hired 14,443 career and non-career employees. We evaluated a statistical sample of 225 employees, 221 of whom were non-career employees and four of whom were career employees.

What the OIG Found

San Francisco, Bay-Valley, and Sierra Coastal district HR officials did not consistently comply with background screening processes. Key documentation substantiating whether employees received complete background screenings prior to hiring during FYs 2016 and 2017 was missing. Specifically, we found:

  • Thirteen percent (30 of the 225) of the pre-employment investigative files — or 1,877 projected over the universe — were missing.

Of the 195 files we reviewed:

  • Thirty (15 percent or 2,166 projected over the universe) of the available files did not contain an Interview Sheet, which documents the interviewer’s notes.
  • Thirty (15 percent or 2,166 projected over the universe) of the available files did not contain the Interview Checklist, which documents the interviewer’s hiring recommendation.
  • Ninety-eight (50 percent, or 7,221 projected over the universe) of the available files did not contain the Post-Offer Checklist, which certifies that all post-offer activities, including confirmation that the applicant meets suitability requirements, have been completed and met.

In addition, Postal Service officials could not provide evidence that electronic National Agency Check with Inquiries (eNACI) were conducted for 70 employees, 33 of whom are actively employed by the Postal Service. The eNACI process verifies the employee’s FBI criminal history check, employment history, criminal conviction history, education, references, and residence.

In 155 of the 225 eNACI certificates we reviewed (69 percent), four showed that employees were hired by management even though the Inspection Service determined they were not suitable for employment. At the time of this audit, the Postal Service still employs one of the four, but not the other three.

These conditions occurred because district HR officials are not validating that Certificates of Completion are being uploaded into eOPF and there is no oversight mechanism from the district HR generalist/manager to ensure this process is complete.

When Certificates of Completion are not maintained in eOPF, the Postal Service cannot validate the accuracy of the information provided to determine an individual’s suitability for employment. In addition, Certificates of Completion may identify potential disqualifying factors, which hiring officials need to make informed hiring decisions.

What the OIG Recommended

We recommended management develop internal controls to ensure that pre-employment files are established and that all required pre-employment documents are maintained in the files in accordance with policy. We also recommended management implement an oversight process to ensure that district HR officials are validating that Certificates of Completion are in employees’ eOPFs and assess the need for conducting new eNACIs for the 33 missing Certificates of Completion.

Read full report

Comments (2)

We welcome your comments related to the topic on this page. Complaints about the Postal Service, including lost, stolen or mishandled mail, that are unrelated to the content on this page, will not be posted. Please visit the Contact Us page for information on where to file formal complaints with our agency or the Postal Service.

Leave a comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
  • anon

    Though your study has produced numerical values that might guide your human resources office in making improvements in efficiency and hence economy, I can say as an outside observer of the operations of the USPS that no significant breaches of security of the postal service seem to have come from within your system. Such a study by an outside agency might be of proof value; however, I do see that further support from the government against the onslaught of uninformed public or those without the understanding to respect the system in place might improve the security of the US Mail at the interface of the general public and the USPS system. I personally and in business had no problems with the US MAIL service as it was provided and I was well-served. Since I had an internal problem with my business I have had trouble accessing the postal service but am still highly served. (Incidentally, I mention that the internal problem may have stemmed from confusion about a topic discussed in a telephone conversation. Documentation may have been produced in support of resolution after the date of the conversation.)

    May 30, 2018
  • anon

    Wow...this is just fantastic information. All these people hired with no checks whatsoever. Are you going to hold managers accountable besides just issuing a report?

    May 30, 2018