The objective of our audit was to assess the effectiveness of the U.S. Postal Service’s National Recycling Program (NRP).

In fiscal year (FY) 2014, the Postal Service approved $33 million for the NRP as part of an overarching initiative to drive waste and cost out of operations, generate revenue, and provide better stewardship for the environment. The goal of the NRP is to reduce trash disposal costs; and increase recycling revenue from office mixed paper, undeliverable standard mail, and discarded lobby mail by maximizing the value of the existing network.

As of September 2017, the Postal Service has implemented the NRP at 149 of 178 planned sites, with full implementation targeted for March 2019. As part of this audit, we assessed recycling operations at 12 sites in the Greensboro and Suncoast districts and Postal Service Headquarters (HQ) oversight.

What the OIG Found

The Postal Service did not effectively manage the NRP to ensure prescribed goals and objectives were achieved. Specifically, as of September 2017:

  • Trash reduction savings were $5.1 million of the projected $32.8 million, or 16 percent of the goal.
  • Recycling revenue generated was $3.4 million of the projected $14.3 million, or 24 percent of the goal.

In addition, facility employees did not accurately record recycling revenue and expenses within the designated general ledger accounts.

These issues occurred because there was ineffective monitoring at the HQ level, the program execution plan was not fully rolled out, and there were no controls to ensure accurate recording of revenue/cost activity.

As a result: (1) the program is not meeting projected financial goals through its first four years; therefore, increasing the risk the program will not meet its long‑term financial goals, (2) the program has missed its trash disposal savings goal by $28 million and recycling revenue goal by $11 million; (3) recycling revenue and expenses were understated by $205,179 at the six sites we assessed, and (4) the Raleigh Processing & Distribution Center was underpaid $16,477 in recycling revenue.

What the OIG Recommended

We recommended management strengthen controls over program operations, implement financial monitoring and operational oversight responsibilities over the facilities to the district, and reassess and adjust program goals as necessary.

We also recommended management implement a control to validate accuracy of general ledger account entries, reiterate standard operating procedures to appropriate personnel, and provide additional general ledger account entry training, as necessary.

Read full report

Comments (2)

We welcome your comments related to the topic on this page. Complaints about the Postal Service, including lost, stolen or mishandled mail, that are unrelated to the content on this page, will not be posted. Please visit the Contact Us page for information on where to file formal complaints with our agency or the Postal Service.

Leave a comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
  • anon

    Each person in our office has a small blue recycling bin for paper. It has the recycling emblem on it and says "We Recycle". We might has well just throw them out or send them back to the maintenance department. If we put paper in the bins for recycling, the custodians just combine it with the regular trash they are emptying. When asked why they weren't recycling it, one responded "they don't have the time". The only way any of our office's paper gets recycled is if one of us (usually our general clerk) takes it down the hall to the large paper recycling bin on our floor.

    Mar 12, 2018
  • anon

    Yes. I agree. We need recycle plastic cover and strap from bundle as well

    Mar 06, 2018